cheap phentermine diet pill
Why in the world would you take such a beloved gem, a genuine masterpiece of post WWII Disney cheap phentermine diet pill as Cinderella (a film that a broken 1950 Europe embraced so whole heartedly that it won the Golden Bear in Berlin and a special prize at the Venice Film Festival), and tarnish that beautiful memory with such a rank piece of marketing incompetence? It's bad enough that the cheap phentermine diet pill looks like sub par Saturday morning fare (comparing it to the full, classical cheap phentermine diet pill style of the original is heartbreaking), but can't we please get over the whole, "Be true to yourself!" dogma that runs rampant through children's programming today? I'm not kidding; enough's enough. It's gone way overboard. Believe me; I've been to the mall on Saturday afternoons and there are millions of kids out there in America who need to be told don't "be yourself" so much, and to shut their little yappers. You know who else were "true to themselves?" Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy, that's who and that didn't help anybody, now did it? I'm exaggerating of course, but this blanket "Be yourself" mantra that is endlessly being drummed into kids' heads is utterly meaningless when it's packaged over and over again in the guises of boring, stilted cartoons such as Cinderella II: Dreams Come True. It's such a safety crutch for timid writers that you tend to just go along because arguing against it makes you look like a Nazi. Who doesn't want their child to "be themselves," particularly if you're discussing empowering little girls (who are the main viewers of junk like Cinderella II: Dreams Come True)? But can't that message come with some real meat on those tired old story bones? Is "being true to yourself" really just picking out the right colors you want on the castle drapes and choosing chocolate pudding over prunes for dessert, as Cinderella II: Dreams Come True 's first story suggests? Couldn't they come up with something just a little bit more substantial to show Cinderelly's grit and determination? Better yet: why not just skip the whole thing and leave her and the Prince to live "happily ever after," just as the fairy tale intended the story to end? Of all the fairy tales that you could safely leave behind for a sequel, Cinderella would seem to be the most obvious one. The whole point is they lived "happily ever after." It's not rocket science. Those little words ended it; it's up to us to imagine all the magic and mystery that simple phrase suggests. Instead, that gossamer filigree of imagination and wishing and hoping that we all as children imparted on the ending of that lovely fairy tale, comes crashing down with the reality that Cinderella apparently was a fairly common little scullery maid, after all (she likes to wear her old rags in Cinderella II: Dreams Come True), and that contrary to appearances in the first film, her nasty sisters, particularly Anastasia, are worthy of our pity, rather than our well earned scorn. Thank you, new Disney, for making concrete what I only could have wished for. Dreams did indeed come true for viewers of the original Disney Cinderella, but children watching Cinderella II: Dreams Come True may very well learn a hard lesson in pandering for the sake of a buck. ... cheap phentermine diet pill